Ilayda B. Onder

Political Science
International Relations

The Rebel Internal Governance (RIG) Dataset codes original, time-variant information on internal institutions and practices of rebel groups to provide new leverage for examining how their sanctioning of misconduct and insubordination (or its absence) shapes rebels’ violent behavior and relations with civilian populations.

The article introducing the RIG is forthcoming at International Studies Quarterly. The pre-print version of the article can be found here.

166
Rebel groups
57
Countries
14
Variables
23
Years (1990–2012)
2295
Group-years
About the Dataset

A new lens on rebel organizations.

Existing scholarship on rebel governance has documented in rich detail how armed groups regulate civilians: taxing them, providing public goods, holding courts. Far less is known systematically about how rebels regulate their own fighters: how their behavior is codified, monitored, adjudicated, and punished.

Motivation

External governance
Internal governance

Many groups that develop institutionalized systems for governing civilians do not build comparable structures for regulating their own fighters, and vice versa. Existing data on rebel governance of civilians cannot serve as a proxy for how groups govern their own members.

Variables

Four dimensions, fourteen variables

Download the full codebook
Regulatory Frameworks
Written codes of conduct
Amendment procedures
Judicial Procedures
Official complaint mechanism
Investigative branches
Tribunal proceedings
Public proceedings
Disciplinary Measures
Death penalty
Incarceration
Reprimands or denial of promotion
Punishments for violators' families
Enforcement mechanism
Regulation of Personal Life
Restrictions on friendships
Restrictions on sexual relationships
Restrictions on family ties
Coding Procedures

How the data
were built

Seven coders with relevant regional and thematic expertise were trained on a standardized coding protocol, including a common set of internal governance keywords (discipline, punish, code, conduct, dissent, insubordinate, misbehavior, misconduct, defect, disobey, trial). Coders fluent in French, Hindi, and Turkish reviewed local news articles, government statements, and rebel-produced publications alongside English materials. Spanish-language sources were not systematically incorporated because Latin America comprises a small share of the 1990–2012 sample.

Data

A glimpse of
the data

Download the dataset (.xlsx) Download the dataset (.RData)
Four dimensions of internal governance
Share of groups (n = 166) with at least one documented practice
Disciplinary Measures
34.9%
Judicial Procedures
21.7%
Regulatory Frameworks
17.5%
Personal-Life Regulation
15.7%
Research Team

Principal
Investigators

Ilayda B. Onder
Assistant Professor · Texas A&M University

Ilayda is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas A&M University. Her research investigates political violence and civil conflict processes with a focus on the intersection of violent political behavior and the socio-organizational dimensions of rebellion. Her scholarship examines rebel-civilian interactions and rebel communication strategies, with emerging projects also exploring multi-party civil conflicts and rebel intra-group politics. Lead author of the RIG.

Email|Google Scholar
Hongbi Choi
Ph.D. Candidate · Texas A&M University

Hongbi is a Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science at Texas A&M University. Her research investigates authoritarian leader survival strategies with a focus on conflict behavior. Co-author of the RIG.

Email|Google Scholar